How to Combat Officer Survey Skepticism: A Police Manager’s Guide to Building Trust and Encouraging Honest Feedback

Best Practices for Police Chiefs to Communicate Their Vision and Strategy to Different Stakeholder Groups

Building Trust in Confidential Surveys: Overcoming Police Officer Skepticism

Progressive law enforcement agencies now regularly conduct anonymous employee surveys to gather candid insights that inform reforms. However, many officers initially view these surveys with skepticism rooted in cynicism about leadership’s true openness to feedback. Preventing skepticism is essential for achieving high response rates and fulsome input. This post explores proven strategies.

Stress Anonymity and Security

Assuring absolute confidentiality is paramount. Emphasize measures like:

  • Using external third-party platforms like Officer Survey that prevent agency access to raw response data.
  • Allowing survey completion only on personal devices or provided kiosks to avoid tracking.
  • Enabling IP masking, randomized response orders, and disallowing write-in answers that could indicate identities.
  • Coding printed survey mailings to track dissemination while preserving anonymity.
  • Securing responses immediately using encryption to prevent any data compromise.

The more thoroughly anonymity is protected, the more forthcoming officers will be. Breaches destroy trust rapidly.

Prohibit Retaliation

Beyond technical protections, prohibiting retaliation for survey responses is critical. Consider steps like:

  • Enacting zero tolerance policies via union collaboration.
  • Sharing examples of past discipline for corroborated retaliation to emphasize seriousness.
  • Encouraging reporting of any suspected reprisals through named/confidential contacts.
  • Investigating all retaliation reports thoroughly, being transparent about outcomes.

Clear anti-retaliation stances reinforced regularly help alleviate concerns of consequences for honesty.

Communicate Benefits

Officers need to understand why their perspectives matter before engaging sincerely. Convey benefits like:

  • Data insights identify issues leadership might be unaware of otherwise.
  • Policy and culture can evolve based on officer needs versus top-down assumptions.
  • Proof leadership wants input to undertake reforms thoughtfully.
  • Opportunity to provide confidential feedback safely, enabling catharsis.
  • Chance to feel heard and help drive positive change.

Explaining how participation improves the department encourages buy-in.

Incorporate Officer Feedback

To overcome skepticism of inaction, continually demonstrate how confidential survey data guides reforms. Examples:

  • Form officer task forces to review results and provide reform recommendations.
  • Make policy revisions addressing priority pain points identified.
  • Improve equipment/technology based on needs officers surface.
  • Enhance trainings shown to have gaps in preparedness.
  • Launch new initiatives officers suggest for community relations, wellness, etc.

Visible outcomes prove the process produces real change versus being empty lip service.

Report Back Regularly

After launching reforms driven by survey findings, follow up with transparent progress reports. Methods include:

  • Updates during roll calls and leadership meetings.
  • Results highlights in newsletters, internal memos, and social media.
  • Anonymous data reportbacks showing improved scores.
  • Celebrating officer stories of positive impacts from enacted changes.

Closed feedback loops maintain engagement over time by demonstrating leaders deliver on promises to listen.

Lead by Example

Rank-and-file skepticism often starts with middle managers protective of their authority. Their vocal backing and participation sets the tone. Ways to lead top-down include:

    • Chiefs and command staff completing surveys first to model support.
    • Encouraging friendly competition between units’ response rates.
    • Having officers share positive survey experiences at briefings.
    • Not taking critical feedback personally, but listening earnestly.
    • Using data to improve leadership’s own practices.

Leading by example quells rumors of ulterior motives that breed disengagement.

While overcoming potential skepticism takes time, the strategies above can build officer trust that providing confidential feedback is worthwhile, safe, and constructive. Opening secure communications channels strengthens relations internally and with communities. Signup for Officer Survey and start engaging with your force today!

Share this post

Share this post